Wednesday, October 11, 2006

Lynnie Doesn't Live Here Anymore

Does anybody else find it peculiar (not to mention utterly unrealistic) that Lyn Scully, who has owned that ugly white box house on Ramsay Street for years, was conveniently shoved out of the house and into Paul Robinson's two doors down when the Baby Belt deal went south, and then when her boarders, the Timmins family, had the good fortune to have the house bought for them, they didn't immediately get Lyn to move back in? Or even consider her, in any way?

Think about it for a second: Lyn housed first Stingray, and then HIS ENTIRE FAMILY (all bar two older brothers we're yet to meet) out of the goodness of her heart for months and months (possibly more than a year; I've lost track), but when Loris Beaumont/Timmins bought the damn house for Janelle and the kids, no one thought that it'd be a great opportunity to return the favour to the newly-evicted Scullys? How about even handing the house back over to Lyn as a "thank you / don't feel bad for losing your house / look what good fortune has provided for us all!" kind of thing?

But instead of the very reasonable expectation that they'd want to help Lyn's newfound homelessness, Janelle and crew simply struck any thought of Lyn and Oscar from their minds and made themselves completely at home in the house in which they had effectively been free-loading.


Lyn opened her home to the Timmins family for years ...


... but Janelle shut her out when she obtained ownership.


Of course, I know the REAL reason behind it. As reported on TV Is My Life last month, Lyn and Oscar are soon to be leaving the series. And this means that the writers had to find a way to turn the possession of the house over to the characters who would be continuing to live in it - and the quicker it could happen, the better for all concerned.

It strikes me as odd that no mention was made of having to split the house with Lyn's estranged husband Joe Scully in Bendigo, but I guess the more speedily they rush through the whole process and the less they mention these things, the more likely no one will notice and think anything odd.

BUT THINKING ANYTHING ODD IS MY 'SPECIAL GIFT'!*

This is clearly an incident of the writers needing to change certain dynamics of the characters' living arrangements, and not wanting these very real-life complications arising to distract anyone from their previously-set plot course.

This is what you call a 'plot device', people. I mean, as if the owner of the house who'd opened her home up to this bogan family of leeches wouldn't be majorly upset and 'dark' that said bogans then acquired her home when she was the one down on her luck - and they hadn't extended her the same privilege and generosity she'd been showing them for so long. And as much as the Timmins family represents everything 'uncivilized' about the worst of Australian families, I think even they would naturally have wanted Lyn and Oscar to move in free-of-charge, in return for everything the Scullys had done for them.

It's like no one's going to mention the pink elephant in the room. This all-too-convenient avoidance of the topic from everyone concerned is a little too ... well, ... convenient for my money.

So it's a good thing it's on free-to-air TV, then.


* According to my high school careers counsellor.

.

5 Comments:

At Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:58:00 PM, Blogger Melba said...

neighbours, and shows like it, is riddled with plot devices. it's the air they breathe. not so much a case of the naked emperor as we'd all be exhausted dealing with ALL of them. i just let them go by and suspend my utter utter disbelief.

how's sweetums?

 
At Tuesday, October 24, 2006 3:04:00 PM, Blogger BEVIS said...

Who knows? I'm too busy watching Neighbours.





Whoa, hold on a minute, there. No I'm not. Sweetums is lovely. Thank you for asking, MG. He sends his love.

How's Princess? If she was the missing child at the end of Big Blogger, did you find her? (I hope so!)

-----

As for this post, I understand that they've got to let some things slip (and so do we), but this one was just a little bit too major to allow under the radar, for mine.

 
At Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:34:00 AM, Blogger Adam said...

Whoa! What other odd things have you thought?

 
At Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:39:00 AM, Blogger PiesFan90 said...

I had exactly the same thought. There was not evena hint of a mention that she would be invited back to "Her" house. I noticed though that Lyn didn't even have those thoughts either. She moved her Grandmothers picture straight over to Pauls and that's that.
Wherever I hang my granny photo, that's my home....

 
At Friday, October 27, 2006 9:27:00 PM, Blogger BEVIS said...

Adam, I think it's only fair that I address this question of yours more fully in its own post. But not over here; it doesn't fit within the TV-themed requirements. Look out for it soon on IBM.

Clokeeeey, exactly! You seem to be of a different opinion on this matter to your other half. Perhaps it's a potential topic for HeSaid-SheSaid?? Anyway, the idea that it never occurs to Lyn to be annoyed by these events is a factor I intended to mention when originally composing this post, but I forgot to come back to it. Thank you for bringing it up! It's just ludicrous to expect us to believe that the woman who owned the house and let these no-good layabouts live there for so long wouldn't have been even a little miffed when she lost the home and had to move in to her boss/lover's house two doors down, only to have the layabouts gain ownership of her place and not even think to invite her back. Very obviously the writers just wanted to fast-track the characters' change of living arrangements by not drawing attention to it and hoping that no one watching would notice. But it's just a little too unrealistic a factor to ignore, isn't it.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home