Friday, March 02, 2007

Heroes Gets Lost


I’m about to give a less-than-favourable review of Heroes, but don’t get me wrong – I’ve watched all five episodes that have so far screened on Australian TV and intend to continue watching it. I do enjoy it, but I just think it steals many of its more creative and storytelling elements from a show that outshines it (IMHO), Lost.

If you haven’t seen it, Heroes is a show about a group of young people (why are they all young people – will this change or at least be explained at some point? Why aren’t we seeing elderly grandparents suddenly developing the ability to drive at the speed limit, rather than twenty kilometres too slow?) who find themselves gaining superhuman abilities. Each person discovers a different ability. One guy can fly; one can paint the future. One girl is indestructible; another loses time and appears to be a Hulk-like character when her subconscious takes over. One guy is able to ‘wish’ himself through time and space, while another guy appears to adopt the powers of those around him, like a sponge. And then there’s the cop who can read minds (you wouldn’t want him to pull you over for a speeding ticket!).

Apart from one standout Japanese character, all the others in this ensemble cast of unlikely superheroes are (of course – because that’s just how things work on US television) Americans. (At least Lost features a Brit, a Saudi, and an Aussie – still not as many Aussies as you’d expect on a flight from Sydney to LA, but at least those other nationalities are represented!) But let’s not get too caught up in that aspect.

Instead I want to focus on the aspects of Heroes which remind me – a little too much – of Lost. Bear in mind as we go through this list, that Lost did it first. (And, in most cases, better.)




Lost does not have an opening credit sequence as such. Instead, only a title card for the name of the show is given. All other credits are played over the top of the first scene. Actors’ faces are not put against their names in the ‘regular’ fashion.

Heroes does not have an opening credit sequence as such. Instead, only a title card for the name of the show is given. All other credits are played over the top of the first scene. Actors’ faces are not put against their names in the ‘regular’ fashion.





Lost has an ensemble cast of characters all going through a tough time together and wanting to discover the truth about where they are and what their companions are up to.

Heroes has an ensemble cast of characters all going through a tough time together and wanting to discover the truth about who they are and what they can do.





Lost utilises the intriguing storytelling method of looking back at parts of each character’s backstory in order to tell a new aspect to the one long story on the island.

Heroes utilises the intriguing storytelling method of jumping around from main character to main character in order to tell the one story – eventually hooking them all up in the one place and giving them the same purpose.





Lost employs the clever method of having tiny links between the main characters in their ‘former lives’ (such as common minor characters or appearing on TV screens in the background of each other’s flashbacks) to intertwine their lives before they’d even met. This rewards the eagle-eyed viewer and adds depth to the overall story.

Heroes employs the clever method of having tiny links between the main characters in their ‘former lives’ (such as common objects like comic books being in each other’s possession or appearing on computers, newspapers and TV screens in the background of each other’s stories) to intertwine their lives before they’d even met. This rewards the eagle-eyed viewer but does not seem to propel the story.





Lost has clever references in characters’ names (Jack Shepherd, John Locke, James Ford, Henry Gale, etc) that mean something about their personalities to the intelligent viewer.

Heroes has the character name ‘Hiro’, which is similar to the show’s title.





Lost has Jin and Sun, a pair of Asian characters whose dialogue we understand through the use of subtitles and one of them being able to speak English. They are Korean.

Heroes has Hiro and Ando, a pair of Asian characters whose dialogue we understand through the use of subtitles and one of them being able to speak English. They are Japanese.





Lost has ‘The Others’, whose exact motives are unclear, but who clearly wish to capture the survivors and/or play mind games with them. These people fill the need for having ‘baddies’.

Heroes has Mr Bennet and his associates, whose exact motives are unclear, but who clearly wish to capture the Heroes, determine the extent of their abilities, and/or play mind games with them. These people fill the need for having ‘baddies’.





Lost has the cute brunette (Kate) with a troubled past (and present) who finds herself having to choose between two men (Jack and Sawyer).

Heroes has the cute blonde (Niki) with a troubled past (and present) who finds herself having to choose between two men (DL and Nathan).





Lost has the quiet but brilliant dark-skinned guy (Sayid) who doesn’t let on as much as he knows or is thinking.

Heroes has the quiet but brilliant dark-skinned guy (Mohinder) who doesn’t let on as much as he knows or is thinking.





Lost had the infiltrating nasty guy (Ethan, then later Goodwin and Henry ‘Fenry’ Gale, aka Ben) who pretended to be one of them and a friend until he turned on them for his own nefarious purposes (although he was doing someone else’s dirty work for them).

Heroes has the infiltrating nasty guy (Mr Bennet) who pretended to be a friendly adoptive father to the cheerleader (Claire) but will eventually turn on her (and the others) for his own nefarious purposes (although he’s doing someone else’s dirty work for them).





Lost has the little black kid with the old-man name (Walt) who may or may not have amazing abilities.

Heroes has the little black kid with the old-man name (Micah) who may or may not have amazing abilities.





Lost has elements of the supernatural or the ‘unexplained’ running as a major part of its basic plot.

Heroes has elements of the supernatural or the ‘unexplained’ running as a major part of its basic plot.





Lost was promoted as “The new series of Lost”.

Heroes was promoted as “The new Lost”.






All that being said, Heroes is impressively put together and lots of fun to watch. The drama and intrigue are enjoyable and for the most part it’s an enticing story. But personally, I’m not as impressed as I might have been if they hadn’t so obviously lifted everything that makes the show so good directly from Lost.

The original and the best: Lost.


.

8 Comments:

At Friday, March 02, 2007 1:31:00 PM, Blogger mindlessmunkey said...

Simplified openings are replacing more lengthy titles sequences in many American TV shows. Programmers feel the market is so competitive these days, they don't want to give the viewer a chance to get distracted; they jump straight into the action so people won't change the channel while waiting for the show to start. This is also why there are usually no ad breaks or station IDs between programs anymore. This is not ripped off of Lost, it's just part of the current trend.

Most of your other points are fairly tenuous as well. Heroes - like ALL television - can be compared to any number of other shows that came before it. It certainly owes no more to Lost than it does to, say, The 4400.

 
At Friday, March 02, 2007 1:41:00 PM, Blogger BEVIS said...

Re: the credits thing, yeah I know. Every show's doing it. Ugly Betty included. I just wanted to start with that point, seeing as credits are (a) the start to a show, and (b) so important to me (as you may recall from a 7-part dissertation on the topic over a year ago on I Blogged Myself - part 7 still to come!).

But I'd disagree that 'most of my other points are fairly tenuous as well'. I don't think they are at all.

I watch Heroes and I'm reminded heavily of Lost. That's not good by anyone's standards.

And the new show comes off worse for the comparison.

 
At Friday, March 02, 2007 7:39:00 PM, Blogger thanh7580 said...

Second comment which is not exactly related to this post. First part of the second comment, man you really are a TV fanatic. I LOVE (capitals for added effect) watching TV too but you go to the effort of blogging about it all. Secondly, this morning I was looking for a review on the restaurant Horoki and went to a blog called We Do Chew Our Food, which I bookmarked to read more tonight. Then when I looked at your profile, it turns out you're a contributor. Small blog world.

 
At Saturday, March 03, 2007 12:50:00 AM, Blogger BEVIS said...

Thanh7580, welcome! Always great to have a new reader.

Yep, TV is to me what cricket or football or basketball or literature or archeology or ancient history or calisthenics is to other people: It's my number one hobby.

Just because others treat it as a thing to do in moderation between living their lives and just because it has a "couch potato" stigma attached to it, doesn't mean I can't make it something at which I specialise in and treat all aspects of it very seriously.

So please don't think of me as some lazy bum who needs to get a hobby. TV is my life, and I don't have a problem with that choice.

And the Muppets, but that's a whole other blog.

I hope you found what you were looking for at We Do Chew Our Food. :)

 
At Saturday, March 03, 2007 10:27:00 AM, Blogger Enny said...

Myeh - I watched Heroes for the first three or four weeks because we go to The Hun's parents house for dinner and his dad tapes it and we all sit around and watch it. But last week we had something else to do and were at home when Heroes was on and I had no urge to watch it!

I started to find the blonde woman annoying, everything's a bit too dramatic... and as much as I like Hiro, I don't like him enough. Which is a shame!

 
At Saturday, March 03, 2007 8:51:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heroes keeps reminding me of X-Men:

Rogue: Utilises the powers of nearby mutants
Peter Petrelli: Utilises the powers of nearby heroes

Wolverine: Incredible regenerative ability
Claire Bennett: Incredible regenerative ability

Kitty Pryde: Phases through solid matter
DL Hawkins: Phases through solid matter

Charles Xavier: Telepathic
Matt Parkman: Telepathic

Storm: Flies
Nathan Petrelli: Flies

Still, a lot of these are fairly standard superhero abilities.

 
At Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:45:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Our family watched the 1st 3 episodes of Heroes but then we decided that it was too graphic and now we are all happily back to watching House (which we had been recording).

BTW I'm glad the cheerleader is indestructible for her sake, she wouldn't last 10 minutes otherwise, was there ever someone so accident prone?

On the LOST side of things, I have loved LOST from the beginning but am really getting over the length of time its taking to go anywhere. i'm not sure how much longer I'll last.

 
At Tuesday, March 06, 2007 1:08:00 PM, Blogger BEVIS said...

Enny, exactly. Well said.

Flashman, yes - that's an even more obvious parallel, isn't it. They've simply said, "Imagine X-Men for people who aren't into comic books!" and just gone with that.

Colls Bolls, it certainly is very graphic, yes. And without wanting to sound like an old foagie, I'm not convinced it needs to be. They're just showing off and/or trying to shock everyone and therefore generate the 'wow' factor. That reaction happens if the show's brilliant; it can't be manufactured by showing us a lot of fake blood and gore. Meanwhile, I'd encourage you to stick with Lost. Allow it to tease and taunt you with its 'baby steps' progress. If you're patient and enjoy the ride, I'm confident it'll be worth it for you and you'll have a great time along the way.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home